A change of mindset has repetitively been occurring in the mind of those who were disabused by what they were taught at Churches. Unfortunately not all shift in mind-set has been for the better.Throughout my Christian walk, I have repetitively met folks who pride themselves with innovative alteration of century long standing biblical doctrines. One that is more recent is the way different folks have abused the precious concept and truth about God's grace.
In 2005, I first got acquainted with what I easily identified as early abuse of the concept of grace when I read a book which I shall leave unnamed. The book presented grace as a mean to discount any moral responsibility to a sinner. Actually, it seemed to ask the sinner to rejoice of his sin because no moral accountability seemed necessary because of the Grace of God. If my memory serves me well, this was the first time i got a snippets about this erroneous views. Although the book argued quite interestingly about the immensity of God's favor also know as God's grace toward the sinners, the author unfortunately messed up what he tried to argue for along the way.
Two years ago in March 2012, I started writing a series of posts about Grace and the Law at the request of a friend. I was told that there was a kind of war waged against the doctrine of grace by those of a legalistic (from the Law) persuasion. So I wrote my first post and a second one which were supposed to launch my series of posts about the contrast between Grace and the Law from a biblical point of view.
However, I was never able to continue that series of posts. Shortly after my second post, i realized that the outcry against those who spoke about "Grace" were not made by legalistic folks as i was led to believe initially. The outcry came from those who believed themselves in the biblical doctrine of Grace but were just sickened by the way a group of teenagers and young-adults abused the biblical teaching of grace.
For more than 15 years I had been discussing and debating against legalism and preaching the message of grace. I knew that legalism could be used and was often used to control people ungracefully in some churches and even in some sermons hence breaking the spirit of the New Testament. But I never really thought or expected that a day will come when people will also start using the message of grace ungracefully and irresponsibly. As my Dad remarked to me once with this french saying: "Qui vivra vera"*. And indeed, as time still goes on, I am still astonished by all the novelty and craziness that keeps creeping out of some emerging churches and some para-churches ministries.
After that 2012 March post, i found myself debating on the internet (Facebook) the very people I first tried to defend. The weirdness kept flooding the social network, as my friends and I tried to keep it under control. Within few weeks, we realized that we were unwillingly in "full-time ministry" of debunking the false doctrines strongly advertised by those preachers of the counterfeit grace message. The situation was so bewildering that offline discussion had to follow.
Not being known as shying away from debate, I was happy to receive an invitation from the Living Word Association (LWA) to join their task-force in debating some of those main and outspoken prominent figures of the counterfeit grace message of that time. With no hesitation I gave my consent. We held two formal debates so to speak. The first one was held at a place of their choosing and the second debate was held at a place of our choosing (LWA). The debate was spirited but done in good faith. Although we severely disagreed on main issues all the way through. We remained nevertheless courteous.
However the aggressiveness in our exchanges kept increasing as the months went on. By the end of the month December 2012, some had dropped out of the public discussion and went into seclusion and hiding. They kept the indoctrination for themselves. Nevertheless some among them throughout the year had shown sufficient intellectual honesty and a honest conscience to reform their former views and stopped talking foolish things as they used too at the early stage of the debates. That was really God's grace in action to save them from false doctrines. But not all were this gracious to the truth. They became unfortunately and willingly insubordinate to the biblical truth to the point to deny the plain meaning of many biblical passages without blinking or bad conscious. We sadly witnessed it during the subsequent year of 2013.
This leads me now to the content of the numerous debates held (online or offline). What did we debate on anyway? I have discussed those issues indirectly and directly on this blog as this can been seen on my posts titles such as, The New bible Deniers ; Should a Christian ask for Forgiveness ; Did Jesus freed us from all Burdens? and more on this blog.
Here are a few points our debates revolved around:
1. This is what started it all. They initially disputed the existence of sins. We on the other side affirmed the biblical reality of the sadness of sins (Roman 3:23; 1 John 2:1-2; etc.).
2. They firmly rejected the fact that Christian should repent from their sins and deeds. We on the other hand affirmed along with the teaching of the new testament that when someone sins - being it a Christian or a non-christian - the path of restoration is through repentance of deed (Revelation 2:21-22; Revelation 3:19; etc.).
3. They discouraged any practice of fasting and praying (this last one I encountered for the first time in a private debate with someone holding an anomalous twist of this counterfeit grace message. However not all of the false teaching of grace movement embrace this virulent view). We affirmed contrary to them that the New Testament encourage us to pray and fast (Mathew 6: 6,16; Acts 13:2-3; etc.).
4. They denied the reality of free-will (the capacity to choose). We affirmed that people have the capacity to make choices (Luke 10:42; etc.).
5. They think that any action done for spiritual or other reasons is by definition a Work which is contrary to their concept of grace. Since for them grace excludes all action a priori. We expressed on the other hand that the New Testament distinguishes among different actions. The New Testament shows that there is a difference between action made by faith and action made legalistically (motivated by the Mosaic law). - Ephesians 2: 8-10; etc.
6. They rejected the usefulness of the Law in all its forms (unconsciously encouraging anarchy). We on the other hands reinforce the distinction between the Mosaic Law (in the Old testament) and Law of Christ (in the New Testament). 1 Corinthians 9:21 and Galatians 6:2; etc..
7. They considered Christians who asked for forgiveness as immature and untaught Christians. We on the contrary affirmed that it is an act of honesty, true repentance and a normal thing to do when a Christian ask for forgiveness when/if s/he had sinned (1 John 1:9 ; 1 John 2:1-2; etc.).
8. They substituted the clear writings of the scripture (Bible) with what they called "the revelation". We on the contrary believe that the Bible itself contains the revelation of the Lord to the Church, and that all so called "revelations" had to meet biblical standard and not substitute itself to the clear and plain wording of the scriptures (2 timothy 3:16).
"All Scripture is God-breathed, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness," - 2 Timothy 3:16
"And all these things happened to them as examples; and it is written for our warning on whom the ends of the world have come." - 1 Corinthians 10:11
The war for truth is not yet over, but we stand strong and ready to defend the hope that is in us (1 Peter 3:14-15).
I would like to encourage new Christians who might not know much about the scriptures that they are wolf teachers out there, teaching what should not be taught. Hence be careful!
There are false teachings (doctrines),
"But the Spirit expressly says that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and teachings of demons" - 1 Timothy 4:1
but there are also true teachings (doctrines),
"Hold on to yourself and to the doctrine; continue in them, for doing this you shall both save yourself and those who hear you." - 1 Timothy 4:16.........................................
* "The One who shall live shall witness things."
